Thinker, doer, iconoclast, professional loudmouth.
Also organisational comms guy, design thinker, user experience and service designer, collaborator, sketchnoter. Open government advocate. TEDizen. Husband. Dad. WoW player. INTP. Crossfitter. Rugby tragic.
This site collects links, books, stories, media and other things I consider interesting for some reason. It's neither work-focussed or personal but happily blurs the two.
See http://about.me/trib/ for greater detail and links to other things.
Loading Tweet...
I’ve been following the Chris Brown story a bit more than I would normally follow an issue like this. Basically the guy is a violent...
We made a mistake. Over the last couple of days users brought to light an issue concerning how we handle your personal information on...
Friedman drives me crazy. His newest nonsense is Average Is Over:
Thomas Friedman, ...
MICHAEL.
FASSBENDER.
NUDE.
SCENES.
MOM, THIS IS GREG. HE IS MY NEW BOYFRIEND AND WE ARE IN LOVE. SAY HI, GREG.
…
HONEY, IS THIS ABOUT HOW NOBODY ASKED YOU TO THE WINTER FORMAL?
...
SERIOUSLY? YOU CALL THAT A SUICIDE NOTE? IT IS RIFE WITH TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS, NOT TO MENTION IT HAS THE EMOTIONAL RESONANCE OF AN AXE BODY SPRAY...
h/t @dobes
(Alternate title: The New Work Ethic)
I wrote this email to a friend a few weeks ago, and then the topic came up...
2 posts tagged innovation
“Here’s how it works. Flexible Purpose Corporations can write one or more special missions into their articles of incorporation. They can be as ambitious as fighting climate change or as modest as maintaining a park near the company’s office. The law instructs directors to consider the special aims in their decision-making, even when it could mean lower returns for investors. To make the appeal as broad as possible, the law’s authors avoided setting a minimum standard for what a “special purpose” could be.”
Patagonia Road Tests New Sustainability Legal Status - Bloomberg
We need similar laws in Australia, I believe.
I’ve never been one to conform, and Havas Media Lab Director and HBR blogger, Umair Haque isn’t either. The radical re-imagining of economics and capitalism he proposes in The New Capitalist Manifesto is an idea for the 21st Century, rising out of the ashes of a still-burning post-Industrial economy. Illustrating his new economics through comparisons between old economics (and the companies living off it) and the new “betterness”-based economics, Haque argues extensively and convincingly that what organisations need to do in the 21st Century to continue to survive is focus on an operational model:
The twenty-first century capitalist’s agenda, in a nutshell, is to rethink the “capital”—to build organizations that are less machines, and more living networks of the many different kinds of capital, whether natural, human, social, or creative. And, second, to rethink the “ism”: how, when, and where the many different kinds of capital can be most productively seeded, nurtured, allocated, utilized—and renewed. What we need, then, is a new generation of renegades, laying deeper, stronger institutional cornerstones.
Haque’s argument resonates super-powerfully with me. While I certainly don’t have the chops to have written The New Capitalist Manifesto, it articulates many of the arguments I’ve put to people in the past 10 years; business today is no longer sustainable in the way it was before. It can’t go on cannibalising profits and circulating the same money (and making more and more “pretend” money that only exists in a computer somewhere. Business needs to act to add real social value and not only make money but make social goods as well, as Haque suggests, the paradigm needs a shift thus:
I can’t recommend The New Capitalist Manifesto strongly enough, and also highly recommend Umair Haque’s new, short ebook, Betterness, which extends his articulation of some of the themes in this book. If it was mathematically possible to give a book 6/5, I would give it here.
Loading posts...